Walter,
You make some very good points. I hope you'll indulge me
further and allow me to ask some more questions, and maybe make
a point or two of my own.
"What I AM saying,because it pisses me off really bad,is
that we are NOT there on a mission for God,we are not there as
humanitarians,we are there to fight a war.No matter what Bush(or
his wife)says,we are bombing their country,we are NOT making
their lives better,we are destroying farmland and buildings that
they cannot replace when this is all over."
I agree that our troops are not there for any mission for God.
Our troops are there because we were attacked...as you said.
However, do you honestly believe that the people who are
suddenly free enough to watch movies, buy goods in shops, get
haircuts, etc are not better off than they were a month or two
ago? Maybe I just look too hard to try to see good in
everything, but were I a woman living there, I would consider
myself better off if I no longer had to worry about being beaten
to death should my burkah fall off in the street. We had
American missionaries there before this war to aid the sick and
the hungry. I can't help but feel that our troops have made this
a safer place for those missionaries to return to in order to
continue their work.
However...a lot does depend on whatever government is in power
next...as you pointed out.
"Soon,the Northern Alliance will begin fighting amongst
themselves(as they have done time and again),and that country
will rise again to become the shithole that it was before."
Do you know of anything we can do about that other than have the
peacekeeping troops there as is planned? The reality to me, is
that we NEEDED the Northern Alliance to go after bin Laden.
Just as we NEEDED bin Laden to help Afghanistan repel the
Soviets. Just as we NEEDED Iraq's help with Iran during the
rule of Khomeini. Yes, it does seem that everytime we NEED
someone, and help someone, we get bitten in the ass for it.
But, what are the alternatives? Do you think that our
involvement in any of the above was a bad move? Didn't we HAVE
to be there to protect the interest of either our own country or
our allies? I think there is just a whole lot of gray area here.
"When Bush makes his statements about the"Evil Ones",it heavily
implies that we are the"Good Ones".I don't believe that we are."
I too wish he wouldn't make statements like that...I think it's
political posturing in an effort to get Christian votes
(especially since he made a bunch of them mad by approving the
stem-cell deal). But, as a whole...I think we are good.
Certainly, not every one of us is. We have our fair share of
crazies, and misguided, and purely evil people in this country.
There's no doubt of that. But, when the country makes a move as
a whole...I truly believe that we BELIEVE we are doing the RIGHT
thing...the thing that is best for all concerned. Of course,
any move we make will have some people who don't agree...that's
America. In my country, I have the RIGHT to be WRONG.
I believe that most people in this country DO care. And, maybe
they can't make themselves sit through yet another "hungry
child" infomercial...most of us have seen them 50,000 times or
so already. I think that people show that they care in the only
ways most of them can...by sending money to charities and
churches who will send people there to work on the problems. We
have stuff here that needs dollars and people too, and so what
we send gets divided. What REALLY pisses ME off is the
charities like the Red Cross who use 70-80% of the money WE give
them to help with these things for ADMINISTRATION costs. Once
you start looking at how much of the money you send gets lost in
the shuffle...it makes you want to stop contributing to those
types of charities. One bad one gives them all a bad name. I'd
like to see a new law on the books that limits administration
costs to no more than 20%...or maybe 10% would be even better!
And, I think a lot of churches are just as bad...funneling the
lion's share of contributions into building bigger, badder
buildings to attract more money. I agree there is much wrong
with this country in the way that it deals with issues that need
help...both here and elsewhere. But, until someone gets a
lawmaker's ear through a lobby group...nothing is going to
change.
I think anytime we fight for freedom anywhere, we are fighting
for America. I think this current conflict proves that. We
should have gone after this group long before now, but we
didn't. We HAVE gone after other groups though...and maybe
never even heard what we did because it was a covert operation.
And, who knows, we may have taken care of a problem 15 years ago
that would have culminated in an even larger attack if left
unchecked.
I don't have all the answers, Walter. I don't think anyone
does. It's just not all black and white...that's all I know.